Some of these features are only visible when "plain text" is off.
Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added letters | |
passage added above the line | passage with added text above |
passage added on the line | passage with added text inline |
passage added in the margin | passage with text added in margin |
handwritten addition to a typewritten letter | typed passage with added handwritten text |
missing or unreadable text | missing text noted with "[illegible]" |
uncertain transcriptions | word[?] |
notes written by someone other than Willa Cather | Note in another's hand |
printed letterhead text | printed text |
text printed on postcards, envelopes, etc. | printed text |
text of date and place stamps | stamped text |
passage written by Cather on separate enclosure. | written text |
I do like you, and I am interested in your literary
supplement3. But I wonder if you know how many demands there are on a poor
writer's time, and how perplexing some of them are? One has, in common decency, for
instance, to answer the letters of nice old ladies who ask foolish questions before
one replys to those of hustling young newspaper men whose friendliness might be of
pecuniary value to one. Can't you s see that that
very fact makes them come last? Publicity has got to be such a brazen game these
days, that one has much ado to keep
one's self respect, anyhow. You'll admit it would be much less cheap to go out and
shout about a new hair oil or a tooth paste than about one's own books.
In your editorial "A Revaluation"4, all that you say5 is t true, and yet I don't think you make it clear why
it is true. Of course a writer of imaginative literature must not be literal; he
must be able to be literal, he must know everything he
touches well enough for that. But if he is an artist he will not be literal, because
no artist can be. If he has the proper equipment to be a writer of fiction at all,
he will never have to puzzle as to how far he should be literal; he has a selective
machine in his brain that decides all that for him. If he has not [illegible] such an
instrument, he had better choose another profession.
An artist uses any particular scene or incident not to
show how much he knows about it, or because it is in itself interesting. He uses it
because of a certain effect of color or emotion that it will contribute to his story
as a whole, because it is in the mood of the story, or helps to make the mood.
Therefore, in writing this scene, he will use as much detail as will convey his
impression, no more. If he has the right kind of memory,-- and the novelist's memory
is quite as special a thing as the #musicaian's
#musician's-- he will remember only the
details of any event which contributed to the major impression the event made upon
him. The writer does not "efface" himself, as
you say6; he loses himself in the amplitude of his impressions, and in the
exciting business of finding all his memories, long-forgotten scenes and faces,
running off his pen, as if they were in the ink, and not in his brain at all. If he
is an artist worth the name, what he remembers is right, what he has forgotten was superficial, accidental, and is better
forgotten.