Some of these features are only visible when "plain text" is off.
Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added letters | |
passage added above the line | passage with added text above |
passage added on the line | passage with added text inline |
passage added in the margin | passage with text added in margin |
handwritten addition to a typewritten letter | typed passage with added handwritten text |
missing or unreadable text | missing text noted with "[illegible]" |
uncertain transcriptions | word[?] |
notes written by someone other than Willa Cather | Note in another's hand |
printed letterhead text | printed text |
text printed on postcards, envelopes, etc. | printed text |
text of date and place stamps | stamped text |
passage written by Cather on separate enclosure. | written text |
I read the bunch of themes you sent with interest. It seemed to me that the most interesting ones were those by Lois Bradford3, Philip Wilcox4 and L. Frantz5.
I see that most of the students flounder about with those wretched old terms "Romantic" and "Realistic". Wouldn't it be possible once and for all to limit the Romantic Novel with the Scott6 and Dumas7 kind of plot construction, and somehow get it into the student's mind that a romantic novel may have nothing to do with what we ordinarily call romantic feeling - that "Romantic" in this case hasn't an adjective force, but is merely part of the name? It really should be combined with the noun as it would be in German. Unless the romantic novel is limited to one with a definite sort of plot construction, there is no end to the ambiguities which follow.
Give my regards to your class, and tell them I hope I do not write entirely without romantic feeling, but that I could not write a real Romantic Novel like "The Three Musketeers"8 to save my life.
Very cordially yours, Willa Cather