Some of these features are only visible when "plain text" is off.
Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added letters | |
passage added above the line | passage with added text above |
passage added on the line | passage with added text inline |
passage added in the margin | passage with text added in margin |
handwritten addition to a typewritten letter | typed passage with added handwritten text |
missing or unreadable text | missing text noted with "[illegible]" |
uncertain transcriptions | word[?] |
notes written by someone other than Willa Cather | Note in another's hand |
printed letterhead text | printed text |
text printed on postcards, envelopes, etc. | printed text |
text of date and place stamps | stamped text |
passage written by Cather on separate enclosure. | written text |
Of course, I have not time to reply to all the letters that come in to me; it is rather an unfair contest in correspondence, one against many.
But your letter has a nice friendly, neighborly ring that makes me wish to answer it, though it lay on my desk a long time unread while I was traveling. On reading it I feel as if I had been to a Sunday evening service in my own town of Red Cloud4 and heard some one talk about somebody's books - not mine. You say you wonder why I have never written anything sympathetic about religion, and this rather astonishes me. I have had so many, many letters from clergymen, both Protestant and Catholic, telling me that they find a very strong religious theme in at least two of my books5.
Perhaps you think that because "Death Comes for the Archbishop" is about the work of Catholic missionaries, it is not concerned with religion as you know it.
Now, my dear lady, I am not a Roman Catholic. I am an Episcopalian, as were
my father6 and mother7. Bishop
Beecher8 of Hastings,
Nebraska9, confirmed me. I am a Protestant, but not a narrow
minded one. If you make a fair minded study of history you cannot be too narrow. What organization was it that
kept the teachings of Jesus Christ10 alive between the year 300 A.D. and the
days of Martin Luther11? I am sure that
your minister will admit that nothing but a powerful organization could have
brought the beliefs of the early church across to us through the anarchy and
brutality that followed the fall of the Roman Empire.
This is a rather solemn and pedantic reply to your pleasant and neighborly
letter, but I do think all Christians ought to know a little more history
before they decide that there is only one kind of religion. I am sure I need
not tell you, dear Mrs. Carstens, that this letter is entirely personal and
confidential, and is not for quotation or publication. I have no objection,
however, to your showing it to your minister; perhaps he can prove to me
that there were "Protestant" churches before Martin Luther, but I have never
yet been able to find any convincing evidence that there were .
any such.