Skip to main content

#1694: Willa Cather to Carl Jefferson Weber, January 31, 1945

More about this letter…
Plain view:

Guide to Reading Letter Transcriptions

Some of these features are only visible when "plain text" is off.

Textual Feature Appearance
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark deleted passage
passage deleted by overwritten added letters overwritten passage
passage added above the line passage with added text above
passage added on the line passage with added text inline
passage added in the margin passage with text added in margin
handwritten addition to a typewritten letter typed passage with added handwritten text
missing or unreadable text missing text noted with "[illegible]"
uncertain transcriptions word[?]
notes written by someone other than Willa Cather Note in another's hand
printed letterhead text printed text
text printed on postcards, envelopes, etc. printed text
text of date and place stamps stamped text
passage written by Cather on separate enclosure. written text
Postmarked NEW YORK, N.Y.
10 P.M., Jan. 30th,
Rec'd in N.Y.
1/31/45
⬩W⬩S⬩C⬩ Mr. Carl J. Weber1 100 Morningside Drive New York 27, N. Y.2
Dear Mr. Weber:

Please disregard any suggestion I may have made that you trace3 some of the erroneous statements about my visit to Housman4. The world is full of erroneous statements, and I notice that they seldom do any one serious harm.

"By misdirections find directions out."? That is a successful method, until it is carried too far. In your first letter you stated that you had heard that I called upon Housman, and that "probably he was rude, as always." I replied to your letter only because I thought silence might mean acquiescence to your supposition that the man was rude. He wasn't rude at all, but very courteous. I felt that I should say so.

In answer5 to your second letter I went a good deal farther than I should have gone, and told you exactly where I met Housman and how I obtained his address.

Now comes your third letter, which is practically a questionnaire. To these questions I do not feel that it is incumbent upon me to reply. You even ask me to expose a second person6 to a cross-examination. After all, this is not a case for the Federal Bureau of Information Investigation. One can dilate upon one's personal experiences, or one can be reserved about them.

I am leaving for Mexico City7 within a few days8, and this is an opportune time to bring our correspondence to a close.

Very sincerely yours, Willa Cather
Mr. Carl J. Weber1, 100 Morningside Drive, New York 27, N. Y.2 NEW YORK, N.Y.2 JAN 30 1945 10-PM