Some of these features are only visible when "plain text" is off.
Textual Feature | Appearance |
---|---|
passage deleted with a strikethrough mark | |
passage deleted by overwritten added letters | |
passage added above the line | passage with added text above |
passage added on the line | passage with added text inline |
passage added in the margin | passage with text added in margin |
handwritten addition to a typewritten letter | typed passage with added handwritten text |
missing or unreadable text | missing text noted with "[illegible]" |
uncertain transcriptions | word[?] |
notes written by someone other than Willa Cather | Note in another's hand |
printed letterhead text | printed text |
text printed on postcards, envelopes, etc. | printed text |
text of date and place stamps | stamped text |
passage written by Cather on separate enclosure. | written text |
I am so sorry that I shall not be in New York4 on the date of the Poetry Society dinner. It would give me great pleasure to meet Mrs. Frost5 and yourself. I want, among other things, to ask you if you ever happened to meet Miss Jewett6. I cannot help regretting that your two volumes7 of verse came along too late for her to see them. They would have meant more to her than to most people, and would have helped to lighten a deep discouragement. She knew a piece of verse from a piece of Ivory Soap, and she died when none save Witter Bynner8 and the Phoebe Snow poets9 smote the lyre.
Of course, the very worst feature in your case is that most of your confreres of
the Poetry Society are so fuddled by the democratic idea of "free verse" that they
do not know the difference between the best line you ever made and a line from the
social paragraphs of the country newspaper. For what can you hope from an audience
of people who have no ear to be hurt by the screech of Florence Earle Coates10 (the worst old war-horse among them!) and no
taste to be offended by the "eugenic verse" of Ella
Wheeler Wilcox11? I believe that most of the young offenders are
"poets" simply to oblige Miss Rittenhouse12.
Like every other boom of worthless stuff, the Poetry Society hurts the real values
temporarily. I've never yet dared go to a meeting for fear that I might be tempted
to hint at something of the sort. So I shall ask you to
regard these remarks as confidential. Publicity is good for poets as well as for
breakfast foods—Miss Rittenhouse and her staff may be of some use to you, after all.
And their methods do not silence quieter ones. In an un-evangelical way, I've put
The
Mountain13, Mowing14, Going
for
Water15, The
Tuft
of
Flowers16
and many others, before a good many people who did not have
to be told anything about them after they read them, and whose ideas [illegible] of—well, of anything!—have
not changed because, as Mr. Masters17
writes18
"The hammock fell
Into the dust with Milton19's poems".
(Anthology20 p. 188)
We can't all regard that event as symbolic!
Very cordially yours Willa S. Cather